Politics > Debate
Central banking
(1/1)
Giuliano Taverna:
I'm split minded about this issue, I used to find Austrian arguments compelling but recently my increased understanding of anti Semitic conspiracy theories regarding evil bankers lead me to question the legitimacy of the disturbingly similar arguments now being made by such fringe demagogues as Ron Paul and Denis Kucinich.
So I did some minor digging and I found this,
http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html
And with my knowledge of history and the preeminence of banking institutions in successful empires, Venice, Brittan, and now America. and some digging on the panics that lead to the formulation of the fed, and my own personal fondness for banking.
http://ehistory.osu.edu/world/articles/ArticleView.cfm?AID=59
http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/The_Great_Republic_By_the_Master_Historians_Vol_III/thepanic_ce.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14004846
http://www.dallasfed.org/fed/frshistory.cfm
I am now starting to lean heavily in favor of the fed, albeit with more oversight and transparency.
What do you think?
SandStone:
I selected "no it's unnecessary and unconstitutional" and I think I've already explained in detail my reasoning for that stance at least to you. ;) :P
Giuliano Taverna:
--- Quote from: SandStone on April 24, 2009, 10:06:23 pm ---I selected "no it's unnecessary and unconstitutional" and I think I've already explained in detail my reasoning for that stance at least to you. ;) :P
--- End quote ---
This might be my forum, but I'm not the only person here.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
Go to full version