Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 192KB, maximum individual size 128KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: May 14, 2009, 07:29:13 pm »

I found it fascinating. A bit to gradual for my tastes, but definitely preferable to direct government intervention.

If the free market can accomplish something, it will do it better than government. The government in my view should only step in where it has to, and act with caution.

The economy is extremely complicated, so much so that it is difficult to effect without creating adverse side effects. Now that's not saying its impossible, but its definitely a risk. I think the problem with liberals today is that they are far too ambitious and caviler about their policies.
Posted by: Alia
« on: May 10, 2009, 11:23:38 pm »

Will definitely give this a viewing tomorrow.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: May 10, 2009, 07:29:46 pm »

I highly recommend watching the following video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HXv_hI-XuY&feature=channel

It raises the profound and attractive proposition of using free market principles to save the environment from overuse and pollution.