Arcadia Power

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Message icon:

Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 192KB, maximum individual size 128KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 15, 2009, 07:56:33 pm »

You should know me by now. Do you think I'd ever let a crime slide? For any reason excluding the merits of the case?
Posted by: Alia
« on: June 15, 2009, 06:03:47 pm »

Well I will concede one point, there is a group that I want to persecute and exterminate... criminals. And since being a criminal is a choice, I'm don't have any qualms about it.

When you do finally realise that some people (not just being racist here, some individuals of all groups are born this way) are predisposed to be violent or sociopathic, you have a choice: Punish people for what they are, or just "let it slide" every time and allow people to be something that hurts all others.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 14, 2009, 10:49:00 am »

Well I will concede one point, there is a group that I want to persecute and exterminate... criminals. And since being a criminal is a choice, I'm don't have any qualms about it.
Posted by: Alia
« on: June 14, 2009, 03:53:14 am »

You're wrong.

1.  an inclination to favor some person or group [syn: favoritism] 

It doesn't matter if the reason for that inclination is reasonable or unreasonable. If you are favouring the son that acts responsibly with your wealth, that is still favouritism. If you are favouring the ethnic group that commits less crimes by putting less of them in Analrapea, that is still favouritism. To not play favourites, you have to treat all groups equally...

...Despite them not being or behaving equally.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 13, 2009, 11:46:32 pm »

No that is not favoritism, that is common sense. People should got to jail if they commit crimes regardless of skin color.

If someone objects to the number of criminals in a group they are welcome to provide information about criminals of another group.
Posted by: Alia
« on: June 13, 2009, 11:33:12 pm »

When I say criminals that is exactly what I mean.

And the law as it stands is colorblind. The more colorblind it gets, the more my race is being punished. The less "favouritism" it has, the more my race is being punished. What you fail to understand is that if ten black people commit a crime, and one white person commits a crime, and ten black people go to jail, and one white person goes to jail, that is favouritism! If two children behave differently, the parents still show favouritism toward the good one when they give him more inheritance; nonfavouritism is evinced by the father in Jesus's story of The Prodigal Son! Favouritism would be turning the squanderous son away, telling him he had his, and get gone! And that's what I want! Favouritism toward my race because they earned it with better behaviour!
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 13, 2009, 10:45:42 pm »

since my stated position rejects any favoritism, I don't see why you are bringing this up.

Law should be colorblind, and that goes for favoring minorities as well as favoring the majority. I have no loyalty to blood, my loyalty is to my ideals, and they have no relation to heredity.

But what do you mean when you say criminals? If you are refereeing to a group of individuals who have committed a crime worthy of a capital offense then that is fine. If not...
Posted by: Alia
« on: June 13, 2009, 10:02:43 pm »

I advocate the killing of the group that is criminals. I advocate killing when it becomes necessary to preserve the race. What if it comes down to it? What if "minority" advantage continues to increase until at very last, the remnants of the white race stand taxed to the gills and ready to lose their houses - to be given, subsidised and tax-free to minorities - and their families and their ability to produce families?

At that point I think it's time to start shooting, even if it will do very little good. I will not advocate allowing my race to go gentle into that good night.

Think about it objectively, and read your own essay on the matter. The continuing trend is minority advantage. You're a logical person, do you see any evidense that such a trend will reverse or even plateau? And don't you understand why white birth rates in America are not even at replacement levels? Don't you see that if such trends continue to increase, there will be no white people left?

Just let me ask you this... If the "majority" was, instead of "Caucasian" - anyone with Roman blood, and the very lifeblood carried within individuals, of your heart and soul, was what was being attritioned away, how would you feel?
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 13, 2009, 09:17:34 pm »

It should go without saying that I am refereeing to groups that do advocate violence. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be posting on this forum.

Its a simple, if you advocate killing group x, you should be imprisoned. Since you have never done that, I have no real issue with you.
Posted by: Alia
« on: June 13, 2009, 07:47:56 pm »

Rush is alright in small doses.

Update, neo Nazi white racist anti Semitic nationalist James Von Brunn is responsible for the attack in DC. I advocate a full on assault on white supremacists. Treat them as Hostis humani generis.

Uhm... Okay. But I advocate nonviolence. I always have. I'm not saying I disagree with Brunn fundamentally, but I do advocate nonviolence, until the case arises that our own people are really and truly not safe, at which point I advocate violence. For example, if the Great Obama does take away guns, or if laws are passed that make it impossible for people to defend themselves in their own homes from thieving ***slur deleted*** or if things reach a breaking point and some sort of innocuous-sounding white slavery is enstated - then I advocate violence. And I'm pretty sure this will happen eventually, and there will be more shootings.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 11, 2009, 01:30:00 pm »

These dangerous Zionist organizations must be identified, examined, challenged, and neutralized, charges of "anti-Semitism" notwithstanding. Zionist control of our news and entertainment media, to include TV network news, TV entertainment programs, Hollywood, newspapers, magazines, radio [even Limbaugh and Hannity "talk" radio], represents the means to justify an end to America. America is only vital to Zionism in terms of the military might that can be commandeered by Israel, and the enormous taxpayer funds that can be funneled to Israel due to its failed socialist economy. The problem for them is an American freedom-oriented and armed populace, which present a major threat and obstacle to the Zionist Illuminati’s agenda for a New World Order directly under their control.


This is one hell of an onion, the more I peal back the layers the less right wing this gets. Seems to me like the entire spectrum of third parties both left and right wing.

Reverent Wright has issues with Der Jew as well.

“Them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he’ll talk to me in five years when he’s a lame duck, or in eight years when he’s out of office. ..."

Source dailypress,0,7603283.story

Earlier this month at the Israel Day Parade in New York City, anti-Semites expressed themselves in a variety of hateful ways, including a banner that read, “Close Guantanamo Bay and Re-Open Auschwitz.”

Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 11, 2009, 10:41:29 am »

It turns out Von Brunn in addition to hating Jews, also hates Neo conservatives, the war in Iraq, corporations, globalization, Bill O'reily and George Bush. So in other worlds he has more in common with Michael Moore than he does with George Bush.

Interestingly neo con is a code word for Jew, its funny I had no idea so many people were anti Semitic, and I had no idea I looked or sounded Jewish...

And according to my sources white supremacists claim he was trying to force the people at the Museum to answer some questions at gun point. Now obviously these white supremacists will say anything to make him seem less crazy but considering the last time he broke into a federal building with a gun, IE his attempted "citizens arrest" of the federal reserve board many years back, it makes a lot of sense and is a plausible motive. In his deranged mind he may have considered it OK to walk into a federal building, point a gun at a security guard and demand answers to what would probably be questions aimed at debunking the holocaust. Its possible he would have forced people to deny it at gun point, and its just as possible that he snapped halfway through this thing and just opened fired scratching the original plan.

In either event two things are clear from this new information. One the right wing extremist movement is as anti GOP as it is Democrat, and two they are totally convinced in the justice of their cause and there is no telling what these individuals are capable of.

I repeat what I said earlier. These groups should be investigated with a massive reallocation of resources, and their websites should be shut down. There should be a law against the kind of non factual racist propaganda that they spread. Lying to people and indoctrinating them with anti American beliefs should be a crime. Because that is precisely what created men like Von Brunn who is truly an enemy of all mankind or at least an enemy to both political parties.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 10, 2009, 03:21:15 pm »

He did in fact attack the Federal reserve, he is a NWO truther!

In his own words, the Nazi describes his twisted version of the events

Its as I have been saying, the anti fed people are anti semitic terrorists!
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 10, 2009, 02:39:44 pm »

Update, neo Nazi white racist anti Semitic nationalist James Von Brunn is responsible for the attack in DC. I advocate a full on assault on white supremacists. Treat them as Hostis humani generis.
Posted by: Giuliano Taverna
« on: June 10, 2009, 01:27:05 pm »

Jews are being targeted for extermination by right wing fanatics. Neo nazi extremists, and Islamic fundamentalists are trying to commit a global Holocaust. Just today a Holocaust museum in DC was attacked.

Prior to this a botched attempt at bombing Jewish communities in new york,

and a serial killer shot and killed a Jewish college student and had a diary describing larger attacks on the local Jewish community.

With the president of Iran building nuclear weapons to attack Israel, and the Nazi's in Europe using "solidarity with Palestine" as a cover to gain more power and to help the Islamic fundamentalists destroy the Jewish state. It should be extreme cause for concern.

All Jews around the world, and all non Jews like myself who appose genocide should stand up in revolt against all anti Semites and use whatever means possible to stop this.